Stabilization and savings funds to manage natural resource revenues: Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan versus Norway created by Matthias Luecke,
Material type: TextSeries: Comparative economic studies ; Volume 53, number 1Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 08887233
- HB90 COM
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | HB90 COM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 53, no. 1 (pages 35-56) | SP11431 | Not for loan | For in house use |
Do the sovereign wealth funds of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan promote the sustainable use of government oil revenues? We review the operational rules and performance of the two funds and compare them to Norway's Government Pension Fund – Global. The key challenges are to stabilize government expenditures despite volatile resource prices, build up a capital stock to draw on after the resource is depleted, and to save and spend resource revenues transparently. We conclude that the institutional framework of a resource fund may indeed enhance transparency and public scrutiny, limit discretionary control, and sustain public support for long-term savings of resource revenues.
There are no comments on this title.