Assessing the effect of energy technology labels on preferences/ created by Eleni Fimereli and Susana Mourato
Material type:
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 21606544
- HC79 JOU
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HC79 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 2, no.3 (pages 245-265) | SP17939 | Not for loan | For In House Use Only |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
This paper investigates the effect of using labelled versus generic unlabelled alternatives in choice experiments (CEs) in the case of a multidimensional environmental good (power generation) that is often associated with strong prior beliefs and emotions. Specifically, it assesses the effect of naming selected low-carbon energy technologies on the underlying choices, the implicit prices for the technology attributes and the total economic values attached to their environmental benefits. Our findings are only mildly suggestive of a labelling effect where respondents employ different processing strategies when confronted with labels, focusing principally on the label and/or considering attributes differently. In the case of power generation, the use of labelled alternatives led to significantly different estimated attribute parameters; in contrast, most implicit prices remained undistinguishable and computed welfare measures were found to be statistically equivalent.
There are no comments on this title.