Monotone comparative statics: changes in preferences versus changes in the feasible set/ created by Nikolai S. Kukushkin
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0938-2259
- HB119 ECO
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | vol. 52, no. 3 (pages 1039-1060) | SP21293 | Not for loan | For In house Use | |||
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 52, no.3 (pages 1039-1060) | SP21041 | Not for loan | For In house Use |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Let a preference ordering on a lattice be perturbed. As is well known, single crossing conditions are necessary and sufficient for a monotone reaction of the set of optimal choices from every chain. Actually, there are several interpretations of monotonicity and several corresponding single crossing conditions. We describe restrictions on the preferences that ensure a monotone reaction of the set of optimal choices from every sublattice whenever a perturbation of preferences satisfies the corresponding single crossing condition. Quasisupermodularity is necessary if we want monotonicity in every conceivable sense; otherwise, weaker conditions will do.
There are no comments on this title.