Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Ideology and endogenous constitutions/ created by Alessandro Riboni

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Economic theory ; Volume 52, number 3Berlin: Springer, 2013Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 09382259
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HB119 ECO
Online resources: Abstract: We study a legislature where decisions are made by playing an agenda-setting game. Legislators are concerned about their electoral prospects but they are also genuinely concerned for the legislature to make the correct decision. We show that when ideological polarization is positive but not too large (and the status quo is extremely inefficient), institutions in which the executive has either no constraints (autocracy) or many constraints (unanimity) are preferable to democracies that operate under an intermediate number of constraints (simple majority rule). When instead ideological polarization is large (and the status quo is only moderately inefficient), simple majority turns out to be preferable.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) vol. 52, no. 3 (pages 885-914) SP21293 Not for loan For in house use
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol. 52, no.3 (pages 885-914) SP21041 Not for loan For in house use

We study a legislature where decisions are made by playing an agenda-setting game. Legislators are concerned about their electoral prospects but they are also genuinely concerned for the legislature to make the correct decision. We show that when ideological polarization is positive but not too large (and the status quo is extremely inefficient), institutions in which the executive has either no constraints (autocracy) or many constraints (unanimity) are preferable to democracies that operate under an intermediate number of constraints (simple majority rule). When instead ideological polarization is large (and the status quo is only moderately inefficient), simple majority turns out to be preferable.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.