Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Social insurance, commitment, and the origin of law: interest bans in early christianity by Jared Rubin

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Journal of law and economics ; Volume 52, number 4Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 00222186
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HB73 JOU
Online resources: Summary: Despite the historical importance of ideology‐based, economically inhibitive laws, we know little about the economic factors underlying their origin. This paper accounts for the historical emergence of one such law: the Christian ban on taking interest—a doctrine that shaped the evolution of numerous financial contracts and related organizational forms. A game‐theoretic analysis and historical evidence suggest that the Church’s commitment to providing social insurance for its poorest constituents encouraged risky borrowing, which the Church attempted to limit by banning interest. The analysis highlights the applicability of the rational choice framework to seemingly irrational actions and laws, the role of nonmonetary sanctions in circumventing commitment problems, and the importance of economic forces vis‐à‐vis ideology
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Despite the historical importance of ideology‐based, economically inhibitive laws, we know little about the economic factors underlying their origin. This paper accounts for the historical emergence of one such law: the Christian ban on taking interest—a doctrine that shaped the evolution of numerous financial contracts and related organizational forms. A game‐theoretic analysis and historical evidence suggest that the Church’s commitment to providing social insurance for its poorest constituents encouraged risky borrowing, which the Church attempted to limit by banning interest. The analysis highlights the applicability of the rational choice framework to seemingly irrational actions and laws, the role of nonmonetary sanctions in circumventing commitment problems, and the importance of economic forces vis‐à‐vis ideology

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.