"Discussion of "Critical accounting policy disclosures"/ created by Mary Brooke Billings
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0148558X
- HF5601 JOU
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HF5601 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 26 , No.1 (pages 77-80) | SP9776 | Not for loan | For In House Use Only |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Carolyn B. Levine and Michael J. Smith (2011) examine firms’ critical accounting policy (CAP) disclosures. With respect to motivation for disclosure, Levine and Smith (2011) document an increased likelihood of CAP disclosure for firms facing high ex ante litigation risk. Focusing on the informational value of disclosure, they find evidence consistent with CAP disclosure influencing investors’ valuation decisions. Although the paper provides a large sample analysis of a relatively new accounting disclosure practice, I raise some questions about what we can (and cannot) learn from their findings. In so doing, I highlight potential topics for future research.
There are no comments on this title.