The accuracy of graphs to describe size distributions
Material type:
- text
- unmediated
- volume
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB1.A666 APP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol.20 , No.16 - 18 (Dec 2013) | Not for loan | For In House Use Only |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
This article analyses the performance of the graphs traditionally used to study size distributions: histograms, Zipf plots (double logarithmic graphs of rank compared to size) and plotted cumulative density functions. A lognormal distribution is fitted to urban data from three countries (the United States, Spain and Italy) over all of the twentieth century. We explain the advantages and disadvantages associated with these graphic methods and derive some statistical properties.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.