Who should supervise banks for the banking sector stability?
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB1.A666 APP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol.20 , No.16 - 18 (Dec 2013) | Not for loan | For In House Use Only |
We empirically examine by whom the commercial banks should be supervised for the stability of a banking sector. With a cross-sectional dataset from 78 countries and using a logit estimation model, we find that the probability of the instability of a country’s banking sector reduces if the commercial banks are supervised exclusively by the country’s central bank. This probability is even higher if the central bank can conduct its supervision in a less-corrupt institutional environment. Finally, by carrying out some counter-factual thought experiments, we confirm that banking supervision causes banking sector instability, not vice versa.
There are no comments on this title.