Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Free lunch thinking : how economics ruins the economy / created by Tom Bergin.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Random House Business Books, 2021Description: vi, 377 pages : illustrations ; 24 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9781847942739
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HB171 BER
Contents:
Introduction The Laffer conundrum : do lower taxes help growth? The Feldstein reveltion : do high taxes make us lazy? The hire and fire debate : is job security economically damaging? The Jensen claim : can money make your a better manager? The Stigler hypothesis : does a minimum wage cost jobs? The Russell graph : do 'sin taxes' work? The Pigou-Coase disagreement : does regulation harm economic growth? The Jorgenson thesis : are taxes on business damaging?
Summary: Why most economic assumptions made by governments are wrong Over the past few decades, certain economic theories have achieved the status of fundamental economic truths among many of the world's governments: that high spending is always dangerous, for example; that taxing corporations less makes them more productive; that the way to stop people doing things you don't want them to do (drinking, smoking and so) on is to make them pay more for the privilege. In Free Lunch Thinking economist and journalist Tom Bergin takes ten of the most prevalent economic mantras and assesses how they play out in practice in the real world. He studies the Irish experience with free trade to establish whether open markets are always desirable. He scrutinises the US belief that high tax rates lead to lower tax revenue (the 'Laffer curve'). He looks at Italy's flirtation with the view that employment must be wholly flexible if jobs are to be created. And he considers the realities of the 'big' vs 'small' government debate in countries that range from Brazil to Sweden to Japan. Again and again, he shows how common assumptions are rarely rooted in observed outcomes, and how countries frequently pursue economic courses that have more to do with faith than facts. His book both challenges lazy thinking and sets out a path for more considered future
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction
The Laffer conundrum : do lower taxes help growth?
The Feldstein reveltion : do high taxes make us lazy?
The hire and fire debate : is job security economically damaging?
The Jensen claim : can money make your a better manager?
The Stigler hypothesis : does a minimum wage cost jobs?
The Russell graph : do 'sin taxes' work?
The Pigou-Coase disagreement : does regulation harm economic growth?
The Jorgenson thesis : are taxes on business damaging?

Why most economic assumptions made by governments are wrong Over the past few decades, certain economic theories have achieved the status of fundamental economic truths among many of the world's governments: that high spending is always dangerous, for example; that taxing corporations less makes them more productive; that the way to stop people doing things you don't want them to do (drinking, smoking and so) on is to make them pay more for the privilege. In Free Lunch Thinking economist and journalist Tom Bergin takes ten of the most prevalent economic mantras and assesses how they play out in practice in the real world. He studies the Irish experience with free trade to establish whether open markets are always desirable. He scrutinises the US belief that high tax rates lead to lower tax revenue (the 'Laffer curve'). He looks at Italy's flirtation with the view that employment must be wholly flexible if jobs are to be created. And he considers the realities of the 'big' vs 'small' government debate in countries that range from Brazil to Sweden to Japan. Again and again, he shows how common assumptions are rarely rooted in observed outcomes, and how countries frequently pursue economic courses that have more to do with faith than facts. His book both challenges lazy thinking and sets out a path for more considered future

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.