The ‘effective’ measure of unemployment benefit duration: data on spells or individuals?
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB1.A666 APP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol.20 , No.13 - 15 (Oct 2013) | Not for loan | For In House Use Only |
Using administrative data, this article measures the ‘effective’ duration of unemployment benefit recipiency. Our results suggest that this duration varies considerably when we use spells instead of data on individuals. The exit hazard rate from unemployment using spells is overestimated when compared to the one obtained with data on individuals and, therefore, the expected duration of unemployment benefit recipiency is underestimated.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.