"Return" and extension actions after ethnobotanical research: the perceptions and expectations of a rural community in semi-arid Northeastern Brazil created by Ulysses Paulino de AlbuquerqueLuciana Gomes de Sousa Nascimento, Fabio José Vieira, Cybelle Maria de Albuquerque Duarte Almeida, Marcelo Alves Ramos & Ana Carolina Oliveira da Silv
Material type: TextSeries: ; Volume , number ,Brazil Springerlink 2010Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | BJ52.5 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | vol 25 no 1 (19-32) | SP12558 | Not for loan | For in-house use only |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The scientific community has debated the importance of “return” activities after ethnobiological studies. This issue has provoked debate because it touches on the ethics of research and the relationships with the people involved in these studies. This case study aimed to investigate community perception of an ethnobotany research project that was carried out in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. Furthermore, we reported how the residents of this rural community felt about participating in the activities of “return” that arose from the projects. Our findings demonstrate that “return” activities should be planned from the design phase of the research until its closure as a lifelong process that allows the communities involved to gradually take ownership of the information and actions that are being generated. Similarly, we argue that such activities must be negotiated with the people of the community so that they have decision-making power and autonomy to decide what is most relevant to their lives.
There are no comments on this title.