Are we on the same page? The performance effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust.
Material type: TextSeries: ; Volume , number ,Washington American Psychological Association 2015Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | BF636 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol.100 , No.5 (September 2015) | Not for loan | For In House Use Only |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Taking a multiple-stakeholder perspective, we examined the effects of supervisor–work group trust congruence on groups’ task and contextual performance using a polynomial regression and response surface analytical framework. We expected motivation experienced by work groups to mediate the positive influence of trust congruence on performance. Although hypothesized congruence effects on performance were more strongly supported for affective rather than for cognitive trust, we found significant indirect effects on performance (via work group motivation) for both types of trust. We discuss the performance effects of trust congruence and incongruence between supervisors and work groups, as well as implications for practice and future research.
There are no comments on this title.