The Rigor of management education and the relevance of human resource development: Natural partners or uneasy bedfellows in management practice Sally Sambrook and Hugh Willmott
Material type: TextSeries: Management Learning ; Volume 45, number 1,Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2013Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | HD20.15 MAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol.45, No.1 page 39 - 56 | Not for loan |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Management learning has traditionally straddled the parallel universes of human resource development and management education, between which there has been little dialogue or research. The article explores their relationship both conceptually and through a pedagogic example. It is noted how key elements of learning in organizations, such as training and development, have co-evolved with changes in management practice. Here, we consider the contribution of what has come to be termed ‘human resource development’ to shaping management, including its influence upon the education of managers. We illustrate this issue by reflecting upon the delivery of a human resource development–inflected core module on a Master of Business Administration programme in a UK Business School. Difficulties encountered by students in grasping the relevance and value of this module are seen to parallel difficulties in formulating human resource development in a manner that does not reduce it to a set of tools and techniques used to identify and manage aspects of the ‘human resource’ targeted for ‘development’. By exploring management education and human resource development, we assess whether they are natural partners or uneasy bedfellows in the contemporary development of managerial practice.
There are no comments on this title.