Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Economic consequences of equity compensation disclosure/ Jeremy Bertomeu

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance ; Volume 27 , number 4 ,Thousand Oaks, Califonia: Sage, 2012Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 0148-558X
Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: The primary role of equity compensation is to provide incentives to an effort-averse agent. Here, the author shows that the chosen level of equity incentives, when publicly disclosed, will also convey information about future earnings, causing two-way linkages between incentive compensation, and financial reporting. If (a) market prices respond more (less) to information, (b) the manager is more (less) risk averse, or (c) earnings are more (less) noisy, then the firm’s owners choose more pronounced (muted) incentives, in turn leading to greater (lower) future earnings. The model explains observed spurious correlations between firm performance and executive compensation, and it provides several new predictions linking managerial, earnings, and market determinants to optimal equity holdings.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HF5601 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol 27, No 4 pages 471-496 SP15201 Not for loan For In-house use only

The primary role of equity compensation is to provide incentives to an effort-averse agent. Here, the author shows that the chosen level of equity incentives, when publicly disclosed, will also convey information about future earnings, causing two-way linkages between incentive compensation, and financial reporting. If (a) market prices respond more (less) to information, (b) the manager is more (less) risk averse, or (c) earnings are more (less) noisy, then the firm’s owners choose more pronounced (muted) incentives, in turn leading to greater (lower) future earnings. The model explains observed spurious correlations between firm performance and executive compensation, and it provides several new predictions linking managerial, earnings, and market determinants to optimal equity holdings.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.