Midlands State University Library

Assessment feedback only on demand: (Record no. 168184)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02134nam a22002537a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20241111090923.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 241111b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1469-7874
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Language of cataloging English
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
050 00 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number LB2300 ACT
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Jones, Ollie
Relator term author
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Assessment feedback only on demand:
Remainder of title supporting the few not supplying the many
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Ollie Jones and Andrea Gorra
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture London:
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Sage Publications,
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2013.
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title Active Learning in Higher Education
Volume/sequential designation Volume 14, number 2 ,
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. There are many pressures on academics to ‘satisfy’ students’ needs for feedback, not least the inclusion of questions about feedback. Many have commentated on the lack of student engagement with summative feedback while most believe that feedback is necessary to improve individual student performance. Several have looked at a range of reasons why students do not collect their feedback, but investigated in this article is how many students collected summative feedback and why they did so. This article outlines an action research–based intervention that involved offering feedback ‘on demand’ to undergraduate students and utilised access statistics data from the virtual learning environment to identify the actual rate of feedback collection by students. Investigated is whether or not there is a discernible preference for seeking feedback where there is a difference between the expected grade and the actual grade. Student survey and the virtual learning environment access data were used to indicate whether students are satisfied with a few short comments and a marking grid, if the mark is similar to their expectations. The resource efficiency and effectiveness for academic staff in terms of providing detailed individual feedback to all students are discussed.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Assessment
Form subdivision Feedback
General subdivision Formative
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gorra, Andrea
Relator term co- author
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier doi.org/10.1177/146978741348113
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 19/07/2013 Vol. 14, no.2 (pages 149-161)   LB2300 ACT 11/11/2024 11/11/2024 Journal Article For in house use only