Midlands State University Library

Why don’t foreign firms cooperate in US antidumping investigations?: (Record no. 165967)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01690nam a22002537a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240606121852.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240606b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 16102878
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Language of cataloging English
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
050 00 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number HF1351 REV
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Moore, Michael
Relator term author
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Why don’t foreign firms cooperate in US antidumping investigations?:
Remainder of title An empirical analysis
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Michael O. Moore and Alan K. Fox
264 1# - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture London:
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Sage,
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2010
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title Review of World Economics
Volume/sequential designation Volume 145, number 1
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Foreign firms face punitive duties if they do not cooperate with the US Department of Commerce (DOC) in antidumping procedures. For example, 37% of all foreign firms involved in antidumping investigations in the US faced “facts available” margins for the 1995–2002 period, with average antidumping duties of 31% for cooperating foreign firms, compared to 87% for those who did not cooperate. The existing literature has focused on how DOC discretion has led to foreign firm non-cooperation. This paper instead examines individual foreign firm’s decisions about whether to cooperate during this same period. We find evidence that non-cooperation is consistent with a model of foreign firms rationally choosing not to cooperate, rather than solely as a result of investigating authority bias against imports.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Antidumping
Form subdivision Facts-available
General subdivision US trade policy
Geographic subdivision United States
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Fox, Alan
Relator term co-author
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0035-0
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library Journal Article 14/07/2010 Vol. 145, no. 2 (pages 597-614)   HF1351 REV 06/06/2024 SP3242 06/06/2024 Journal Article For in house use