Midlands State University Library

Major tribunal decisions in Australia in 2012/ (Record no. 165880)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01858nam a22002537a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240604101415.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240604b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 00221856
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Language of cataloging English
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
050 00 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number HD8391 JOU
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Catanzariti, Joseph
Relator term author
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Major tribunal decisions in Australia in 2012/
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Joseph Catanzariti and Christopher Kane
264 1# - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture London:
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Sage,
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2013.
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title The journal of industrial relations
Volume/sequential designation Volume 55, number 3
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This article examines a number of decisions of Fair Work Australia, the High Court of Australia and the Federal Court of Australia from 2012 regarding the application of the Fair Work Act 2009. In the decision of Bendigo v Barclay, the High Court considered how the courts should approach a determination as to whether an employer has engaged in adverse action for a prohibited reason. The Endeavour Coal decisions of Fair Work Australia and the Federal Court have addressed the good-faith bargaining provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Further, Fair Work Australia has resolved conflicting authority regarding the approval of enterprise agreements containing ‘opt-out’ clauses. In other decisions, Fair Work Australia has considered an appeal from unfair dismissal proceedings regarding an employee who was terminated on the basis of an offensive Facebook page, and the Federal Court has confirmed the existence of an implied term of mutual trust and confidence in an employee's contract.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Adverse action
Form subdivision Fair Work Act 2009
General subdivision Good-faith bargaining
Geographic subdivision Australia
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kane, Christopher
Relator term author
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185613480745
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 23/09/2013 Vol. 55, no.3 (pages 356-370)   HD8391 JOU 04/06/2024 SP16978 04/06/2024 Journal Article For in house use only