Midlands State University Library

On the accuracy of Federal Reserve forecasts of the saving rate (Record no. 163261)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01720nam a22002417a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20230914123144.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230914b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name BAGHESTANI, Hamid
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title On the accuracy of Federal Reserve forecasts of the saving rate
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture New York
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Taylor & Francis
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2013
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title Applied Economics Letters
Volume/sequential designation Volume , number ,
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This study investigates the unbiasedness and efficiency of the Federal Reserve forecasts of the saving rate for two distinct periods. For 1984–1997, when the saving rate was relatively stable, the forecasts are generally unbiased and efficient. For 1998–2007, when the saving rate experienced significant declines, the forecasts are generally biased (over-predicting) but still efficient. Evidence of efficiency or ‘weakly’ rationality implies that the Federal Reserve forecasts were generated under symmetric (asymmetric) loss for 1984–1997 (1998–2007). Under asymmetric loss where the forecast errors of the same magnitude but of different signs possess different costs, biased forecasts may still be optimal if the bias is strictly due to asymmetric loss. As such, for 1998–2007, the Federal Reserve staff may have assigned high cost (loss) to under-predictions but little or no cost to over-predictions due to, perhaps, perceiving the unusual declines in the saving rate as temporary.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element forecast evaluation
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element saving rate
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element FOMC
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.831164
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 14/09/2023 Vol.20 , No.16 - 18 (Dec 2013)   HB1.A666 APP 14/09/2023 14/09/2023 Journal Article For In House Use Only