Midlands State University Library

Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina (Record no. 162452)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02669nam a22002777a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20230530144552.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230530b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name HILL, Tammy
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina
Remainder of title an evaluation of regulatory success
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture New York
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Springer
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2013
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title Environmental Management
Volume/sequential designation Volume , number ,
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Data from a probability sample were used to estimate wetland and stream mitigation success from 2007 to 2009 across North Carolina (NC). “Success” was defined as whether the mitigation site met regulatory requirements in place at the time of construction. Analytical results were weighted by both component counts and mitigation size. Overall mitigation success (including preservation) was estimated at 74 % (SE = 3 %) for wetlands and 75 % (SE = 4 %) for streams in NC. Compared to the results of previous studies, wetland mitigation success rates had increased since the mid-1990s. Differences between mitigation providers (mitigation banks, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program’s design-bid-build and full-delivery programs, NC Department of Transportation and private permittee-responsible mitigation) were generally not significant although permittee-responsible mitigation yielded higher success rates in certain circumstances. Both wetland and stream preservation showed high rates of success and the stream enhancement success rate was significantly higher than that of stream restoration. Additional statistically significant differences when mitigation size was considered included: (1) the Piedmont yielded a lower stream mitigation success rate than other areas of the state, and (2) recently constructed wetland mitigation projects demonstrated a lower success rate than those built prior to 2002. Opportunities for improvement exist in the areas of regulatory record-keeping, understanding the relationship between post-construction establishment and long-term ecological trajectories of stream and wetland restoration projects, incorporation of numeric ecological metrics into mitigation monitoring and success criteria, and adaptation of stream mitigation designs to achieve greater success in the Piedmont.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element wetland mitigation
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element stream mitigation
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element mitigation success
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name KULZ, Eric
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name MUNOZ, Breda
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name DORNEY, John R.
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0027-7
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 30/05/2023 Vol.51 , No.5 (May 2013)   GE300 ENV 30/05/2023 30/05/2023 Journal Article For In House Use Only