Midlands State University Library

Comparison of automated scoring methods for a computerized performance assessment of clinical judgment (Record no. 160812)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01683nam a22002657a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20221219112044.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221219b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Harik, Polina
Relator term author
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparison of automated scoring methods for a computerized performance assessment of clinical judgment
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Polina Harik, Peter Baldwin, Brian Clauser
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture Philadelphia :
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Sage;
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2013
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Volume/sequential designation Volume , number ,
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Growing reliance on complex constructed response items has generated considerable interest in automated scoring solutions. Many of these solutions are described in the literature; however, relatively few studies have been published that compare automated scoring strategies. Here, comparisons are made among five strategies for machine-scoring examinee performances of computer-based case simulations, a complex item format used to assess physicians’ patient-management skills as part of the Step 3 United States Medical Licensing Examination. These strategies utilize expert judgments to obtain various (a) case-specific or (b) generic scoring algorithms. The various compromises between efficiency, validity, and reliability that characterize each scoring approach are described and compared.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Perfomance assessments
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Automated scoring
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Constructed response items
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Baldwin, Peter
Relator term author
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Clauser, Brian
Relator term author
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi/10.1177/0146621613493829
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 01/11/2013 Vol. 37, No. 8 pages 587-597   BF39 APP 19/12/2022 SP17345 19/12/2022 Journal Article For in-house use only