The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate (Record no. 160489)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01718nam a22002417a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | ZW-GwMSU |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20221117102353.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 221117b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | MSU |
Transcribing agency | MSU |
Description conventions | rda |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Scott, Dane |
Relator term | author |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | created by Dane Scott |
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE | |
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture | Montana |
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer | Springer |
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice | 2010 |
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE | |
Source | rdacontent |
Content type term | text |
Content type code | txt |
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE | |
Source | rdamedia |
Media type term | unmediated |
Media type code | n |
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE | |
Source | rdacarrier |
Carrier type term | volume |
Carrier type code | nc |
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE | |
Volume/sequential designation | Volume , number , |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | A common tactic in public debates over science and technology is to dismissively label innovations as mere technological fixes. This tactic can be readily observed in the long debate over agricultural biotechnology. While these criticisms are often superficial rhetorical tactics, they point to deeper philosophical disagreements about the role of technology in society. Examining the technological fix criticism can clarify these underlying philosophical disagreements and the debate over biotechnology. The first part of this essay discusses the origins of the notion of a technological fix and distinguishes two types of technological fix criticisms, philosophical and practical. These distinctions are then applied to clarify and evaluate arguments for and against agricultural biotechnology. This analysis should clarify the debates over agricultural biotechnology and bring to light fundamental philosophical differences over the role of technology in agriculture. |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Technological fix |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Agricultural biotechnology debate |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Green revolution |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9253-7 |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Library of Congress Classification |
Koha item type | Journal Article |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type | Public note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Library of Congress Classification | Main Library | Main Library | - Special Collections | 06/06/2011 | Vol 24 .No.3 pages 207-226 | BJ52.5 JOU | 17/11/2022 | SP8311 | 17/11/2022 | Journal Article | For Inhouse use only |