Midlands State University Library

Consumer Attitudes Towards Alternatives to Piglet Castration Without Pain Relief in Organic Farming: Qualitative Results from Germany (Record no. 160332)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02429nam a22002417a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20221110153449.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221110b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Heid, Astrid
Relator term author
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Consumer Attitudes Towards Alternatives to Piglet Castration Without Pain Relief in Organic Farming: Qualitative Results from Germany
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Astrid Heid & Ulrich Hamm
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture Germany
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Springerlink
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2011
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Volume/sequential designation Volume , number ,
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In order to avoid the occurrence of boar taint, castration of piglets without pain relief is a common practice in pork production. Due to increasing animal welfare concerns, the practice will be banned in organic agriculture from 2012 and alternative methods will have to be implemented. An important factor for the successful implementation of such alternatives is consumers’ acceptance of the methods, as consumers’ daily buying decisions are crucial to the further development of the organic pork sector. Thus, this paper explores organic consumers’ attitudes towards piglet castration without pain relief and three alternative methods and examines which aspects of these alternatives are important to consumers of organic products. The analysis of nine focus group discussions in Germany conducted in fall 2009 and involving a total of 89 participants, shows that castration without pain relief in organic farming was unacceptable for participants. Animal welfare, food safety, taste, and costs were principal aspects that participants used to assess the three alternatives. Participants had mainly favorable attitudes towards castration with anesthesia and analgesia. Although participants had some concerns regarding the fattening of boars (taste), there was openness towards this alternative due to its perceived naturalness. Immunocastration was seen quite critically because participants feared that this alternative might lead to (hormone) residues in meat. Overall, the results suggest that fattening of boars and castration with anesthesia and analgesia could be acceptable alternatives to consumers of organic pork.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element consumer attitudes
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element animal welfare
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element piglet castration
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier 10.1007/s10806-011-9350-2
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 10/10/2012 Vol 25.No 5 pages 687-706   BJ52.5 JOU 10/11/2022 SP12597 10/11/2022 Journal Article For Inhouse use only