Reconstruction of the Ethical Debate on Naturalness in Discussions About Plant-Biotechnology (Record no. 160311)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01945nam a22002177a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | ZW-GwMSU |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20221110132648.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 221110b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | MSU |
Transcribing agency | MSU |
Description conventions | rda |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Van Haperen, P. F. |
Relator term | author |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Reconstruction of the Ethical Debate on Naturalness in Discussions About Plant-Biotechnology |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | created by P. F. Van Haperen, B. Gremmen & J. Jacobs |
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE | |
Source | rdacontent |
Content type term | text |
Content type code | txt |
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE | |
Source | rdamedia |
Media type term | unmediated |
Media type code | n |
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE | |
Source | rdacarrier |
Carrier type term | volume |
Carrier type code | nc |
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE | |
Volume/sequential designation | Volume , number , |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | This paper argues that in modern (agro)biotechnology, (un)naturalness as an argument contributed to a stalemate in public debate about innovative technologies. Naturalness in this is often placed opposite to human disruption. It also often serves as a label that shapes moral acceptance or rejection of agricultural innovative technologies. The cause of this lies in the use of nature as a closed, static reference to naturalness, while in fact “nature” is an open and dynamic concept with many different meanings. We propose an approach for a dynamic framework that permits an integrative use of naturalness in debate, by connecting three sorts of meaning that return regularly in the arguments brought forward in debate; cultural, technological, and ecological. We present these as aspects of nature that are always present in the argument of naturalness. The approach proposes a dynamic relation between these aspects, formed by gradients of naturalness, which in turn are related to ethical concerns. In this way we come to an overview that makes it possible to give individual arguments a relative place and that does justice to the temporality of the concept of nature and the underlying ethical concerns stakeholders have in respect to innovation in agriculture. |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | naturalness |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | biotechnology |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | genomics |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Library of Congress Classification |
Koha item type | Journal Article |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type | Public note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Library of Congress Classification | Main Library | Main Library | - Special Collections | 12/05/2012 | Vol 25. No 6 pages 797-812 | BJ52.5 JOU | 10/11/2022 | SP13302 | 10/11/2022 | Journal Article | For Inhouse use only |