MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01888nam a22002057a 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
ZW-GwMSU |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20221108132502.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
221108b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
MSU |
| Transcribing agency |
MSU |
| Description conventions |
rda |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Wissinger, Daniel R. |
| Relator term |
author |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Effects of critical discussions on middle school students’ written historical arguments. |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
created by D. R., & De La Paz, S |
| 264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
|---|
| Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture |
Pennysylvania |
| Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer |
American Psychological Assocation |
| Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice |
2015 |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacontent |
| Content type term |
text |
| Content type code |
txt |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdamedia |
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| Media type code |
n |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| Carrier type code |
nc |
| 440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE |
|---|
| Volume/sequential designation |
Volume , number , |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
In this experimental study, 151 middle school students explored 3 historical controversies, first reading and discussing primary source documents in groups, then writing arguments on their own. Students were either randomly assigned to an experimental condition, using argumentative schemes and critical questions as guides during discussions, or to a comparison condition in which a traditional set of questions was used to guide discussions. Students in both conditions read the same historical controversies and used the same text structure heuristic to better compare reading and writing outcomes after students participated in discussion. The findings after instruction indicate comparable reading comprehension and comparable composing skill on general writing measures across conditions. Importantly, the findings also indicate disciplinary benefits for students in the experimental condition in terms of their ability to learn historical content and regarding the quality of students’ historical reasoning in their written arguments. Argument schemes and critical questions appeared particularly helpful in facilitating students’ substantiation of claims and development of rebuttals. |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000043 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Library of Congress Classification |
| Koha item type |
Journal Article |