Midlands State University Library

Towards an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and gender gap in written composition (Record no. 160062)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01772nam a22002297a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20221104105820.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221104b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kim, Young-Suk
Relator term author
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Towards an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and gender gap in written composition
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Young-Suk Kim, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Jeanne Wanzek, and Brandy Gatlin
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Volume/sequential designation Volume , number ,
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. We had three aims in the present study: (1) to examine the dimensionality of various evaluative approaches to scoring writing samples (e.g., quality, productivity, and curriculum based writing [CBM]) , (2) to investigate unique language and cognitive predictors of the identified dimensions, and (3) to examine gender gap in the identified dimensions of writing. These questions were addressed using data from second and third grade students (N = 494). Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel modeling. Results showed that writing quality, productivity, and CBM scoring were dissociable constructs, but that writing quality and CBM scoring were highly related (r = .82). Language and cognitive predictors differed among the writing outcomes. Boys had lower writing scores than girls even after accounting for language, reading, attention, spelling, handwriting automaticity, and rapid automatized naming. Results are discussed in light of writing evaluation and a developmental model of writing.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Dimensionality
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Writing Quality
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Writing Productivity
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier doi: 10.1037/a0037210
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 21/06/2016 Vol 107. No.1.pages 79-95   LB1051JOU 04/11/2022 SP25272 04/11/2022 Journal Article For Inhouse use only