Midlands State University Library

SWOT Criteria for the strategic evaluation of work integrated learning projects (Record no. 157290)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01873nam a22002537a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field ZW-GwMSU
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20210519151131.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MSU
Transcribing agency MSU
Description conventions rda
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Wait, Marius.
Relator term author
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title SWOT Criteria for the strategic evaluation of work integrated learning projects
Statement of responsibility, etc. created by Marius and Cookie Govender.
264 ## - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture Pretoria
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer UNISA Press and Routledge
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2019
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Source rdacontent
Content type term text
Content type code txt
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Source rdamedia
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Source rdacarrier
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title Africa Education Review
Volume/sequential designation Volume 16, number 4,
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Work integrated learning (WIL) is an integral part of the curriculum in higher education institutions (HEIs). WIL project leaders require a strategy to evaluate the success of WIL projects. This article reports on the evaluation criteria used in assessing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) identified in WIL projects. This multi-qualitative research was conducted to determine and confirm the SWOT criteria deemed significant for WIL project evaluation. Feedback was collated from 12 WIL specialists, representing the major HEIs in South Africa. The Delphi technique and inductive content analysis formed the basis of the research method. The key finding revealed that the strengths of WIL projects should be evaluated by measuring how well the WIL project maintains a competitive advantage and has a strong financial budget. Major weaknesses of WIL projects are a lack of strategic direction and the HEI’s lack of sound academic offerings and reputation.
650 4# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Work integrated learning
650 4# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Work integrated learning project
650 4# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Work integrated learning evaluation
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Govender, Cookie.
Relator term author
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2018.1457965
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Library of Congress Classification     Main Library Main Library - Special Collections 15/10/2020 Vol.16, No.4, pages 142-159   L81.A33 AFR 19/05/2021 19/05/2021 Journal Article For in-house use only