Comparison of automated scoring methods for a computerized performance assessment of clinical judgment
Harik, Polina
Comparison of automated scoring methods for a computerized performance assessment of clinical judgment created by Polina Harik, Peter Baldwin, Brian Clauser - Volume , number , .
Growing reliance on complex constructed response items has generated considerable interest in automated scoring solutions. Many of these solutions are described in the literature; however, relatively few studies have been published that compare automated scoring strategies. Here, comparisons are made among five strategies for machine-scoring examinee performances of computer-based case simulations, a complex item format used to assess physicians’ patient-management skills as part of the Step 3 United States Medical Licensing Examination. These strategies utilize expert judgments to obtain various (a) case-specific or (b) generic scoring algorithms. The various compromises between efficiency, validity, and reliability that characterize each scoring approach are described and compared.
Perfomance assessments
Automated scoring
Constructed response items
Comparison of automated scoring methods for a computerized performance assessment of clinical judgment created by Polina Harik, Peter Baldwin, Brian Clauser - Volume , number , .
Growing reliance on complex constructed response items has generated considerable interest in automated scoring solutions. Many of these solutions are described in the literature; however, relatively few studies have been published that compare automated scoring strategies. Here, comparisons are made among five strategies for machine-scoring examinee performances of computer-based case simulations, a complex item format used to assess physicians’ patient-management skills as part of the Step 3 United States Medical Licensing Examination. These strategies utilize expert judgments to obtain various (a) case-specific or (b) generic scoring algorithms. The various compromises between efficiency, validity, and reliability that characterize each scoring approach are described and compared.
Perfomance assessments
Automated scoring
Constructed response items